Use context and risk register
Define users, foreseeable misuse, potential harm and control owners.
AI & data
TTA's CAT addresses the trustworthiness of AI products, services and organizations. Confirm the target and applicable standards; existing development and management records can serve as evidence.
Source record updated:
Discuss your certification →TTA AI trustworthiness assessment and certification
CAT supports voluntary assurance and customer needs. It does not automatically replace legal AI obligations.
Korean certification schemes and international standards are different. A translated guide does not extend a Korean certificate to other countries. Confirm the target market, product classification and current requirements with the relevant body.
Define users, foreseeable misuse, potential harm and control owners.
Document risk-relevant performance, bias and explainability measures, data and results.
Make risk acceptance, deployment approval and monitoring actions traceable.
Confirm product risk management, organizational management or use governance scope.
Link existing development tool records to requirements and address risk management gaps.
Support document and process review and applicable functional testing, then resolve findings.
Agree timing based on product or organizational scope, risk levels and test readiness.
Quotation based on the agreed scope
Confirm scope, assessor days, retesting, travel and VAT in the final quotation. Institutional fees are separate from Specify subscription charges.
Sources and references ↗Document automation and management cost KRW 300,000 per month. Expert services and certification body testing or assessment fees are separate. Specify supports preparation; the relevant authority or certification body makes the final decision.
Pricing and certification costs →Expert review and consulting are optional, separately scoped services. Choose support for AI Trustworthiness Certification (CAT) based on your team's readiness and the evidence or assessment preparation you need.
The guide does not impose a single template and permits review of existing development and management tool records.
Risk management, organizational procedures and governance may also be included.
No. Check the assessed scope and issued result even when common standards are used.